Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

Fig. 3

From: Comparing the diagnostic value of targeted with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised patients with lower respiratory tract infection

Fig. 3

Comparison diagnosis of tNGS with mNGS and CMT in immunocompromised patients. (A) The comparisons of diagnostic accuracy between three methods in immunocompetent patients and immunocompromised patients. (B) Pathogen spectrum of immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. (C) Comparison between tNGS with CMT and mNGS in the detection of pathogens in immunocompromised patients. (D) Comparison between tNGS with CMT and mNGS in the detection of pathogens in immunocompetent patients. The pathogen detection rate is depicted in the figure. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01,***: p < 0.001

Back to article page