Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of study characteristics

From: Usefulness of sonication in the microbiological diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Author

Year

Country

Culture type

Positivity culture criteria

Reference criteria

Subjects

Cultures

Quality

Nagpal

2015

EEUU

Sonicated

Any growth and significant growth (≥ 2 CFU/ml)

CLIN + DUKE

77

308

High

Device

Swab

El-Ashry

2021

Egypt

Sonicated

Significant growth (≥ 20 CFU)

CLIN + DUKE

52

156

High

Device

Swab

Inacio

2015

Brazil

Sonicated

Any growth (patients with previous antimicrobial treatment)

CLIN + DUKE

83

114

Low

Device

Significant growth (≥ 5 CFU/ml) (patients without previous antimicrobial treatment)

Rohacek

2010

Switzerland

Sonicated

Any growth

CLIN + DUKE

123

247

High

Swab

Oliva

2013

Italy

Sonicated

Significant growth (≥ 2 CFU)

CLIN + DUKE

40

80

High

Device

Mason

2011

EEUU

Sonicated

Any growth

CLIN

82

246

Low

Device

Swab

Garrigos

2020

EEUU

Sonicated

Significant growth (≥ 2 CFU)

CLIN + DUKE

322

322

Low

Nguyen

2015

Italia

Sonicated

Any growth

CLIN

79

79

Low

Chua

2005

EEUU

Device

Any growth

CLIN + DUKE

71

142

High

Swab

  1. Reference criteria: CLIN: Clinical diagnosis of CIED infection based on systemic symptoms and/or local infection signs of CIED pocket/lead; DUKE: Duke criteria