Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy and safety of co-trimoxazole in eradication phase of melioidosis; systematic review

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 22, Article number: 74 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. The two stages of melioidosis treatment are the intense intravenous phase and the oral eradication phase. Although co-trimoxazole has been in use for several years, the literature does not demonstrate uniformity of the drug doses, combinations, or durations suitable for the eradication phase of melioidosis. The safety profile of co-trimoxazole was not documented in the literature, nor have systematic studies of its effectiveness been done. This systematic review sought to study on the dose, duration and combination of co-trimoxazole therapy in view of clinical efficacy and safety in the eradication phase of melioidosis.

Main body

This systematic review included all of the published articles that employed co-trimoxazole in the eradication phase after 1989, including, randomized clinical trials, case–control studies, cohorts, case reports, and case series. Throughout the eradication (maintenance) phase, co-trimoxazole usage was permissible in any dose for any period. A total of 40 results were included in the analysis which contained six clinical trials, one cohort study, one Cochrane review, and thirty-two case series/case reports. Clinical and microbial relapse rates are low when co-trimoxazole is used in single therapy than in combination. There were several adverse events of co-trimoxazole, however, a quantitative analysis was not conducted as the data did not include quantitative values in most studies.

Short conclusion

The dose of co-trimoxazole, duration of the eradication phase, and other combinations used in the treatment was varying between studies. Compared to combined therapy patients treated with co-trimoxazole alone the mortality and relapse rates were low. The lowest relapse rate and lowest mortality rate occur when using co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice daily. The duration of therapy varies on the focus of melioidosis and it is ranged from 2 months to one year and minimum treatment duration associated with low relapse rate is 3 months. The use of co-trimoxazole over the maintenance phase of melioidosis is associated with clinical cure but has adverse effects.

Background

Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacteria, Burkholderia pseudomallei, which can infect both humans and animals [1]. It is also called Whitmore’s disease after Whitmore and Krishnaswamy, who described the infection in 1912 [2]. Melioidosis is endemic in Northern Australia and Northeast Thailand [3, 4] while sporadically clinical cases were reported in many parts of Asia, including Myanmar, Southern India, Sri Lanka, China, Laos, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Philippines, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Cambodia [5].

Burkholderia pseudomallei could be isolated commonly from contaminated soil and water, especially in the tropics [6]. Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacillus that is oxidase positive. The ‘safety pin’ appearance was observed following Gram staining and the term bipolar staining [7]. Besides occupational exposure in farmers, the infection can be spread via inoculation, inhalation, and aspiration, especially in endemic areas [8]. The gold standard for the diagnosis of Melioidosis is in-vitro isolation and identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei in a sample of blood, urine, throat swabs, pus, or wound swabs. Even a single colony of Burkholderia pseudomallei is diagnostic in the symptomatic patient [7].

The incubation period of Burkholderia pseudomallei varies from 1–21 days, with a mean duration of 9 days [8,9,10,11,12,13]. The main clinical feature of melioidosis is fever. The course of the disease can range from acute fulminant septicemia to a localized infection, abscess formation is a characteristic feature of Melioidosis [14]. Abscesses of splenic, liver abscess, skeletal muscles, brain, prostate abscess, and parotid glands have been reported worldwide [15]. Other than that, pneumonia [16], pleural effusion [17], genitourinary infections [18], skin or soft tissue infections [19] encephalomyelitis [20], and bone or joint infections [19, 21] have been reported. Mycotic aneurysms [22], mediastinal infections [23], and thyroid and scrotal abscesses [24] have also been reported.

Treatment of melioidosis can be divided into two phases: intensive intravenous phase and oral eradication phase. In the intensive phase, ceftazidime is mainly used. Ceftazidime, 2–3 g or 40 mg/kg/dose every eight hours intravenously for 2–4 weeks is the regular dose for the melioidosis acute phase. Meropenem 1 g or 25 mg/kg every eight hours for more than two weeks is used instead of ceftazidime in severe cases [25]. However, the dosing and the duration of these drugs may vary depending on several factors such as the presence of bacteremia and co-morbid factors including diabetes, malignancies, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney diseases, thalassemia (7%), atypical mycobacterial disease, steroid therapy [26].

Oral eradication therapy, also referred to as maintenance therapy, follows the intensive intravenous treatment phase, which is the most critical phase for reducing relapses and recrudesces [27, 28]. Co-trimoxazole had been used as the drug of choice for melioidosis eradication therapy, either monotherapy or in combination with other antimicrobials. The duration of the eradication phase varies from 3 to 6 months [27, 29, 30]. When combined with doxycycline relapse rate was 4.6% while co-trimoxazole alone it was 3.2%. Compared to other bacterial infections relapses and recrudescence are common in melioidosis. Bacterial eradication is difficult and melioidosis requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy and often compliance during eradication therapy is low. Also, bacteria tend to remain within the sequestrated focus in the body and when multi-focal involvement the possibility of relapse is high. The organism leads to formation of granuloma and when host has cellular immunodeficiencies and conditions leading to secondary immunodeficiencies such as diabetes the possibility of developing relapses are high. The reason for prolonged eradication phase is to minimize the relapses and the clinical failure. Prolonged use of co-trimoxazole is associated with adverse effects like myelosuppression and skin rashes. B. pseudomallei is intrinsically resistant to aminoglycosides like gentamicin, amikacin, streptomycin and tobramycin, penicillin, ampicillin, first- and second-generation cephalosporins and intermediate results to quinolones. As a result, co-trimoxazole is considered as the drug choice due to the susceptibility and good tissue penetration ability. However, approximately 25% of patients with recurrent melioidosis were discovered to have new infections rather than relapses of their original infection [31, 32].

Co-trimoxazole is the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole [20]. Although it has been used for long years, the exact dose and the required duration in the eradication phase are not uniformly available in the medical literature.

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review which had been conducted to assess the efficacy and the safety profile of co-trimoxazole in the management of melioidosis. This systematic review aimed to analyse the evidence of co-trimoxazole for eradication therapy systematically to synthesize recommendations on the best dose, combinations, and durations of co-trimoxazole in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

Search strategy

We developed this search strategy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews PRISMA search strategy [21].

Inclusion criteria

All the published articles, including randomized clinical trials (RCT), case–control studies, and cohorts in which co-trimoxazole was used in the eradication phase after 1989, were eligible for this systematic review. Due to paucity, we have included case reports and case series as well. All studies were limited to human research only. The co-trimoxazole use could be in any dose for any duration during the eradication (maintenance) phase.

Exclusion criteria

In this, we excluded the articles published in languages other than English. Also, all the studies on the pediatric population and animal studies were excluded. The search was carried out for two months, starting in May 2022. Electronic databases and grey literature were searched after finding the appropriate keywords. An electronic search of PubMed (advanced search) [22], Science Direct (Expert search) [23], Trip (PICO search) [24], Google Scholar (Advanced search) [25], Cochrane Library (Advanced search) [26] and Open-Grey [27] were done. Other than that, reference articles of the included articles were also searched for relevant articles. MeSH and other related terms were used while searching to obtain maximum coverage. We registered this systematic review in the PROSPERO (prospectively registered systematic reviews) under CRD42022345027.

Outcome measures

The outcome measures considered in this review were: microbial failure, one-year non-relapse rate that is the appearance of clinical features of melioidosis after initial improvement, in association with cultures from any site positive for Burkholderia pseudomallei. The relapse can be at any period during or after stopping antibiotic treatment, clinical recurrence is the presence of recurrent clinical features of melioidosis, but not confirmed by positive culture; recurrent melioidosis is the emergence of novel signs and symptoms of infection after the onset of an oral antibiotic response and associated with a B. pseudomallei positive culture. Based on the typing of isolates from the first and subsequent episode, if similar is termed relapse while different considered as re-infection. Treatment failure is the clinical decision to change treatment according to inadequate response to therapy; mortality at one year and adverse drug reactions. We also calculated the mean of the duration and dose of co-trimoxazole in the eradication phase.

Study selection

Study selection was performed by two authors independently. Both authors searched the studies on their own, downloaded the search results as.csv files, and entered them into Rayyan intelligence System separately. Then all the abstracts were screened separately. If abstracts were unclear, details were not available, or no abstracts were available full articles were reviewed. Based on exclusion and inclusion criteria, articles were categorized as excluded, included, and doubtful articles were labelled as 'may be’. Further discussions with the involvement of the supervisory author, resolved conflicts between the selections by the two authors.

Data extraction

The data were extracted separately for each type of study. The controlled trials, cohort, and case–control studies and case reports and case series were included. Usually, for systematic reviews only research articles and reviews are included, herein, due to a low number of such articles, we have included case reports to ascertain more data on adverse effects and valuable clinical findings with dosage.

Data extracted from studies include the year of publication, site of infection, drug combinations given in the eradication phase of the disease, co-trimoxazole dose, the duration, cumulative dose, primary outcome, mortality rate, reported side effects and the methods used in monitoring were extracted.

Quality assessment

Quality assessment was done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (Additional file 1: Table S1), the NIH quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies (Table 1), and the NIH quality assessment tool for case series (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Table 1 Summary of case reports where co-trimoxazole is used as eradication therapy
Full size table

Results

A total of 40 results were found from the searched databases, and no article was selected from their reference list (Fig. 1). The PRISMA search returned four hundred and forty-six (446) articles, forty-six (46) of which were removed as duplicates. After removing duplicates, 400 articles were included for the title and abstract screening. Fifty-four articles were found eligible for full article screening. Figure 2 PRISMA flow diagram presents the number of articles in each step [33].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The search strategies and the number of results in each database

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

PRISMA flow diagram of the review with number of results at each step

Full size image

The focus of infection and antimicrobial therapy

Melioidosis commonly affects the respiratory system leading to pneumonia, pleural effusion, and lung abscesses. In the eradication phase, co-trimoxazole was used following respiratory melioidosis. Mostly the patients were treated with 960 mg of oral co-trimoxazole every 12 h for 3–6 months (Additional file 1: Table S1), and patients clinically improved after treatments. In gastrointestinal melioidosis the liver and spleen were the most affected organs, and, in those patients, co-trimoxazole was given alone or as a combination with doxycycline in the eradication phase. These patients were treated for up to 6 months, and most recovered without relapsing (Additional file 1: Table S1).

In melioidosis develops in brain, co-trimoxazole was given for six months to one year, and after the therapy, no residual neurologic deficits were detected, and patients recovered completely (Additional file 1: Table S1). When Burkholderia pseudomallei invades the spinal cord of patients causing transverse myelitis, patients were given co-trimoxazole and doxycycline combination in the eradication phase. Oral co-trimoxazole 320 mg/1600 mg, twice daily, and doxycycline 100 mg every 12 h, given for six months to one year [17, 19]. After one year of therapy patient with transverse myelitis had residual neurological deficits, including paraplegia, complete sensory loss, and sphincter disturbance [17].

When melioidosis is developed in the bones and joints, they commonly presented with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. They were also treated with oral co-trimoxazole alone and in combination with doxycycline for more than ten weeks in the eradication phase. Patients fully recovered with a full range of movements and without relapses (Additional file 1: Table S1).

There were case reports of orbital cellulitis and necrotizing fasciitis following melioidosis which was treated with oral co-trimoxazole (960 mg) three times a day in combination with doxycycline100mg twice a day for six months. The patient had shown no relapses but had a slight reduction of visual acuity [18]. In genitourinary melioidosis, oral co-trimoxazole was given for less than 20 weeks in the eradication phase [23, 24].

When reporting the adverse effects agitation, exacerbation of psoriatic skin lesions, and thrush [16] were observed in patients who used co-trimoxazole only therapy in the eradication phase, and weight gain was [29] observed in patients who used oral amoxicillin-clavulanate and co-trimoxazole combination. The list of adverse effects is given in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Adverse effects of co-trimoxazole

Full size image

Antimicrobial therapy (monotherapy vs combinations)

There were 6 controlled trials, 1 cohort, and 1 Cochrane review where Co-trimoxazole was used in the maintenance phase. In one RCT co-trimoxazole was used alone; in others (n = 5), it was used in combination with doxycycline (Table 2). In Chetchotisakd et al. [37] co-trimoxazole monotherapy (co-trimoxazole with placebo) was compared with co-trimoxazole combination therapy. Although co-trimoxazole was given via the oral route in all studies, there were variations in the duration of antibiotic therapy among studies (Fig. 4).

Table 2 Summary of the RCTs using co-trimoxazole in the eradication phase
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Different drug combinations used in case series and reports

Full size image

Another RCT [36] compared different durations of co-trimoxazole single therapy during the eradication phase of melioidosis. All other five controlled trials compared two sets of drugs, at least one set containing co-trimoxazole (Table 2). Eight different co-trimoxazole-containing drug combinations have been used in these six trials (Table 2 gives the eight combinations).

Three studies used co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol [7,8,9]; however, the comparison varied significantly (Table 2). Three studies used co-trimoxazole and doxycycline [7, 10, 11], and one study used co-trimoxazole with a placebo [10]. Some studies compared the treatment with drug combinations without having co-trimoxazole. One study used co-amoxiclav [8], two studies used doxycycline [9, 12], and one study used ciprofloxacin and azithromycin [11] in their eradication phase.

Of the case reports, 37/41 co-trimoxazole used in their eradication phase. There were 19 cases in which used co-trimoxazole alone while in 12 cases oral co-trimoxazole and doxycycline combination was used. There were 5 cases with oral co-trimoxazole and amoxicillin clavulanate combination (Additional file 1: Table S1).

There was a patient with a loss of follow-up [29] and one patient changed the antimicrobial (co-trimoxazole to co-amoxiclav) due to adverse effects (Table 3) [16].

Table 3 Different drug regimens and the numbers of studies/case reports with each drug regimens
Full size table

Duration of eradication phase and dosage of antimicrobials

Duration of treatment also varied for different combinations of co-trimoxazole in which 50 percent (four out of eight) had 12 weeks of treatments [7, 9, 11, 13] while the remaining had 20 weeks of treatments [8, 11, 13].

Co-trimoxazole dose in the maintenance phase varies in 6 studies. There were three variations. Two studies used co-trimoxazole 960 mg (160 mg trimethoprim and 800 mg sulfamethoxazole) twice daily regimen [7, 9]. Two studies used co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice-daily regimen [10, 13], and two studies used co-trimoxazole 60 mg/kg/day in two divided doses [8, 11].

The primary outcomes of all RCTs were to assess the mortality and relapse rates. Relapses were due to microbial failure and treatment failure. When using co-trimoxazole alone, culture positive relapse rate was 2% [13] and 1.16% [10]. The clinical relapse rate was 3% in Chetchotisakd et al. [4, 10]. When using co-trimoxazole as a combination therapy culture positive relapse rate vary in between 2 and 21% (Table 2), and the clinical relapse rate varies between 2 and 15.9% (Table 2). It also had 9% of treatment failure [11]. Other drugs and combinations showed culture positive relapse rate of 22–36% (Table 2), treatment failure of 28% [11], and clinical relapse of 13% [9] (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Duration of eradication phase in different studies

Full size image

Mortality in patients with melioidosis after eradication therapy varies between studies. In co-trimoxazole alone, therapy mortality differs from 0.3 to 3% (Table 2) while co-trimoxazole combination therapy is 0–14% (Table 2) and other drug combinations 3.12–8.16% (Table 2).

When considering the duration of the eradication phase, varies from 2 months [20] to one year [21, 22, 29]. In most cases, patients were given antimicrobials for six months. None of the reported cases has been given co-trimoxazole for more than one year or less than one month in the eradication phase (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Outcome following therapy

There were two observational studies, [28] was a retrospective review, and [27] is a retrospective cohort study. In [28], co-trimoxazole, doxycycline combination, and co-trimoxazole alone were reviewed. Oral co-trimoxazole 960 mg (160 mg trimethoprim and 800 mg sulfamethoxazole) was given twice daily for 20 weeks. In combination therapy culture positive relapse rate was 4.6%, and the clinical recurrence rate was 2%, with a mortality rate of 0.9%. On co-trimoxazole alone, culture positive relapse rate was 3.2%, and the clinical recurrence rate was 1% [14].

In Ref. [27], 212 patients were selected for the cohort study, and from them, 95.8% were commenced on co-trimoxazole monotherapy, 2.8% were on doxycycline and 1.4% had no oral therapy. Of those, 88.7% received treatments for 3 months and 9.9% received 6 months or greater. Oral co-trimoxazole 1920 mg was used twice daily. Following co-trimoxazole therapy, there were 2.8% recrudescence and 4.2% recurrences [12].

In 28 cases, patients were cured without any residual abnormalities. There were 3 case reports reported no residual abnormalities following treatment cessation and from that 2 patients were diagnosed with melioidosis in the central nervous system [17,18,19]. There were no identified relapses in any case report, even though 2 patients were followed up for two years [20, 22]. There were no reported deaths due to melioidosis in patients who were treated with co-trimoxazole in the eradication phase.

Adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy

With regard to adverse effects of co-trimoxazole alone, anemia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, rarely hypokalaemia, severe hyponatremia, gastrointestinal side effects [8, 13], acute kidney injury, bone marrow suppression and rash were reported and [12] some patients changed the antimicrobial or opted to reduce the dose. Use of co-trimoxazole combination therapy reported nausea, vomiting or abdominal pain [7, 9,10,11], rash [7,8,9,10], photosensitivity [7,8,9], anemia [7, 11], angular stomatitis [7], anorexia, chest discomfort, dry mouth, seizures, azotemia [7], generalized pruritus [8], Steven Johnson syndrome, severe hyponatremia, severe hyperkalemia [11] and facial erythema [9] which also led to antibiotic dose reduction, change of antibiotic and loss of follow up.

Quality assessment

Six randomized controlled trials were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool (Additional file 2: Table S2). All of the studies introduced at least one form of bias, but the overall risk was low in 4 studies. One study had a low risk of bias in 04 criteria and one criterion with some concerns [37]. Of the remaining studies, three studies have an overall low risk of bias [4, 34, 36] and two studies have some concerns [34, 38].

To assess the cohort and cross-sectional studies, the NIH quality tool was used (Table 4) [27, 28]. According to the raters, both of the studies were fair in terms of risk of bias.

Table 4 Summary of Scores for NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies
Full size table

Thirty-one studies were assessed using the NIH quality assessment tool for the case series (Additional file 2: Table S2). According to the two raters, seventeen studies were good, and all the other studies were fair studies when considering the risk of bias.

Discussion

A phase of aggressive intravenous therapy and a phase of oral eradication is used to treat melioidosis. For many years co-trimoxazole has been considered one of the main drugs used in both phases. Some research articles specify the durations and doses for intravenous therapy [67]. However, they have reported poor adherence to eradication therapy due to adverse effects and in some melioidosis endemic countries have decentralized healthcare facility leading to long distance travel for the follow up. And suggested further research evaluating the duration and necessity of drug regimens of the eradication phase for different forms of melioidosis [67, 68]. Current recommendations propose commencing the intensive phase of treatment with 10 to 14 days of intravenous antibiotics for melioidosis without a focus of infection while 1–28 days or even more with a focus of infection and continuing it with 3 to 6 months of oral antibiotics (eradication phase) [69]. However, these recommendations are not based on the results of recent systematic reviews on eradication therapy [14, 70].

We found that in RCTs, co-trimoxazole monotherapy or in combinations has been tested against co-trimoxazole-containing combinations and combinations without co-trimoxazole. The case reports also have reported different combinations of co-trimoxazole with other drugs. Out of all combinations, oral co-trimoxazole and doxycycline combination is the most frequently used combination in eradication therapy.

Both mortality and relapse rate of melioidosis is higher when using co-trimoxazole as a combination therapy compared to as a monotherapy in the eradication phase [36] (Table 2). The reasons for high mortality rate following combination therapy would be an outcome of high relapses, drug toxicity, high cost and confusion of taking proper medication leading to poor compliance. We note that poor adherence and dropouts to follow the given drug regimen are comparatively higher when the number of drugs in combination is high [34].

However, the number of studies using co-trimoxazole as monotherapy was found only in two clinical trials, two observational studies, and 19 cases. Therefore, the authors believe conclusions based on these may be due to lack of evidence. On the other hand, we could not get an idea about relapse rates by studying case series and case reports. In the case of reports, there is usually no follow-up, so there may be underreporting. This may lead to publication bias. However, those are useful to ascertain adverse effects following antimicrobials.

Altogether six co-trimoxazole dosages were used in studies (Table 2) trimethoprim: Sulfamethoxazole 1:5 (320/1600 mg) combination is the frequently used dose. The 1:5 (320/1600 mg) ratio showed less mortality and low relapses when compared to the 1:5 (160/800 mg) [4] and 1:5 (10/50 mg/kg/day) [38] regimens. This will be an eye opener for the clinicians to re-think about the proper dose to achieve a cure without complications.

The duration of the eradication phase ranged from 2 months to one year, of these, co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice daily for 3 months showed lesser mortality (0.3- 3%), microbial relapse rates (1–2%), and co-trimoxazole 960 mg twice daily dose showed less clinical relapse (1–3%) (Table 2). The current guidelines advise about the treatment duration as 3 months without a focus of infection or even one year with meningitis, brain abscess, bone and joint infections and spinal infection. The poor outcome was associated following short duration of therapy would be due to bacterial sequestration in multiple foci and host immune status [39]. Interestingly the case series and case reports have reported a much longer duration of treatment with co-trimoxazole. Redondo et al. [11] reported 12 months of treatment with the twice-daily regimen, which eventually accounts for more than a 2000 kg cumulative dose for bone infections with melioidosis. The Darwin guidelines recommend only a six-month eradication phase for bone infection. Substantial rates of adverse effects to oral co-trimoxazole seen in this study most likely reflect this high dose used for melioidosis. The adverse event profiles were, in most cases, only able to obtain qualitative data from RCTs. Therefore, a quantitative data synthesis of the occurrence of adverse events was unsuccessful to achieve in this review.

The mortality rate and relapse rate also differ according to the co-trimoxazole dose. The highest culture-positive relapse rate occurs when using co-trimoxazole in 60 mg /kg/day in 2 divided doses than the other two combinations. The lowest relapse rate and lowest mortality rate occur when using co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice daily. The highest mortality rate was recorded when using oral co-trimoxazole 960 mg twice daily (Table 2).

The dearth of RCTs and case reports is one of the most prominently mentioned weaknesses in the papers considered for this evaluation. Selection bias, recall bias, inadequate confounding control, and exposure misclassification are further drawbacks. The eradication phase, multiple dropouts, and failure to follow a standard protocol for the treatment of melioidosis were all significant faults in the trials. Because there were so many different study designs and methodologies, it was difficult to do a quantitative analysis of the results.

Conclusions

The dose of co-trimoxazole, duration of the eradication phase, and other combinations used in the treatment was varying between studies. Compared to combined therapy patients treated with co-trimoxazole alone the mortality and relapse rates were low. The lowest relapse rate and lowest mortality rate occur when using co-trimoxazole 1920 mg twice daily. The duration of therapy varies on the focus of melioidosis and it is ranged from 2 months to one year and minimum treatment duration associated with low relapse rate is 3 months. The use of co-trimoxazole over the maintenance phase of melioidosis is associated with clinical cure but has adverse effects.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in this published article (and its additional files).

Abbreviations

RCT:

Randomised controlled trial

SMX:

Sulfamethoxazole

TMP:

Trimethoprim

HR:

Hazardous ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

References

  1. Thamprajamchit S, Chetchotisakd P, Thinkhamrop B. Cefoperazone/sulbactam + co-trimoxazole vs ceftazidime + co-trimoxazole in the treatment of severe melioidosis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Med Assoc Thai. 1998;81:265.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Corea E. Melioidosis: a neglected tropical disease. Ceylon Med J. 2018;63(1):1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chierakul W, Anunnatsiri S, Short JM, Maharjan B, Mootsikapun P, Simpson AJH, et al. Two randomized controlled trials of ceftazidime alone versus ceftazidime in combination with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(8):1105–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chetchotisakd P, Porramatikul S, Mootsikapun P, Anunnatsiri S, Thinkhamrop B. Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole versus ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(1):29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chierakul W, Anunnatsiri S, Chaowagul W, Peacock SJ, Chetchotisakd P, Day NP. Addition of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to ceftazidime during parenteral treatment of melioidosis is not associated with a long-term outcome benefit. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(4):520–1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. White NJ, Chaowagul W, Wuthiekanun V, Dance DA, Wattanagoon Y, Pitakwatchara N. Halving of mortality of severe melioidosis by ceftazidime. Lancet. 1989;2(8665):697–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilad J, Schwartz D, Amsalem Y. Clinical features and laboratory diagnosis of infection with the potential bioterrorism agents Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Int J Biomed Sci. 2007;3(3):144–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chakravorty A, Heath CH. Melioidosis: an updated review. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(5):327–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wijekoon S, Prasath T, Corea EM, Elwitigala JP. Melioidosis presenting as lymphadenitis: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):364.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephens DP, Thomas JH, Ward LM, Currie BJ. Melioidosis causing critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1500–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo RF, Wong FL, Perez ML. Splenic abscesses in a returning traveler. Infect Dis Rep. 2015;7(1):5791.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dan M, Taran D. Melioidosis of the skin in an Israeli traveler returning from Thailand. Isr Med Assoc J. 2015;17(11):724–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen EW, Mackay MT, Ryan MM. Neurologic melioidosis: case report of a rare cause of acute flaccid paralysis. J Pediatr. 2016;170:319–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiersinga WJ, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):1035–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vatcharapreechasakul T, Suputtamongkol Y, Dance DAB, Chaowagul W, White NJ. Pseudomonas pseudomallei liver abscesses: a clinical, laboratory, and ultrasonographic study. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14(2):412–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meumann EM, Cheng AC, Ward L, Currie BJ. Clinical features and epidemiology of melioidosis pneumonia: results from a 21-year study and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(3):362–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soo CI, Abdul Wahab S, Abdul Hamid F. Pulmonary melioidosis presenting with pleural effusion: A case report and review of literature. Respir Med case reports. 2015;16:54–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koshy M, Sadanshiv P, Sathyendra S. Genitourinary melioidosis: a descriptive study. Trop Doct. 2019;49(2):104–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandey V, Rao SP, Rao S, Acharya KKV, Chhabra SS. Burkholderia pseudomallei musculoskeletal infections (melioidosis) in India. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(2):216–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wongwandee M, Linasmita P. Central nervous system melioidosis: a systematic review of individual participant data of case reports and case series. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):e0007320.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Raja NS, Scarsbrook C. Burkholderia Pseudomallei causing bone and joint infections: a clinical update. Infect Dis Ther. 2016;5(1):17–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong TK, Shan G, Sibangun FJ, Keung BLD. Melioidosis-related mycotic aneurysm: three cases. IDCases. 2021;26: e01295.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kho SS, Ho YF, Chan SK, Tie ST. Mediastinal melioidosis masquerading as malignancy of the lung. Lancet. 2021;397(10278): e8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitmore A, Krishnaswami C. An account of the discovery of a hitherto undescribed infective disease occurring among the population of Rangoon. Ind Med Gaz. 1912;47:262–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dance D. Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43(4):310–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Inglis TJJ. The treatment of melioidosis. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3(5):1296–303.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sullivan RP, Ward L, Currie BJ. Oral eradication therapy for melioidosis: important but not without risks. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;1(80):111–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chusri S, Hortiwakul T, Charoenmak B, Silpapojakul K. Outcomes of patients with melioidosis treated with cotrimoxazole alone for eradication therapy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(5):927–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Saravu K, Vishwanath S, Kumar RS, Barkur AS, Varghese GK, Mukhyopadhyay C, et al. Melioidosis—a case series from south India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(SUPPL. 1):S18-20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng AC, McBryde ES, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, Amornchai P, Day NPJ, et al. Dosing regimens of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) for melioidosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(10):4193–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Maharjan B, Chantratita N, Vesaratchavest M, Cheng A, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, et al. Recurrent melioidosis in patients in northeast thailand is frequently due to reinfection rather than relapse. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):6032–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chowdhury S, Barai L, Afroze SR, Ghosh PK, Afroz F, Rahman H, et al. The epidemiology of melioidosis and its association with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathogens. 2022;11(2):149.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chaowagul W, Chierakul W, Simpson AJ, Short JM, Stepniewska K, Maharjan B, et al. Open-label randomized trial of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline for maintenance therapy of melioidosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(10):4020–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rajchanuvong A, Chaowagul W, Suputtamongkol Y, Smith MD, Dance DAB, White NJ. A prospective comparison of co-amoxiclav and the combination of chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and co-trimoxazole for the oral maintenance treatment of melioidosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(5):546–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anunnatsiri S, Chaowagul W, Teparrukkul P, Chetchotisakd P, Tanwisaid K, Khemla S, et al. A comparison between 12 versus 20 weeks of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as oral eradication treatment for melioidosis: an open-label, pragmatic, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):e3627-33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chetchotisakd P, Chierakul W, Chaowagul W, Anunnatsiri S, Phimda K, Mootsikapun P, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole plus doxycycline as oral eradicative treatment for melioidosis (MERTH): a multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9919):807–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chaowagul W, Simpson AJH, Suputtamongkol Y, Smith MD, Angus BJ, White NJ. A comparison of chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and doxycycline with doxycycline alone as maintenance therapy for melioidosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(2):375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Transverse myelitis secondary to Melioidosis;A case report. https://rayyan.ai/fulltexts/1425912. Accessed 7 Jul 2022.

  40. Weerasinghe NP, Herath HMM, Liyanage TMU. Isolated septic arthritis of hip joint: a rare presentation of melioidosis. A case report. BMC Res Notes. 2018. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-018-3171-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Owen W, Smith S, Kuruvath S, Anderson D, Hanson J. Melioidosis of the central nervous system; a potentially lethal impersonator. IDCases. 2021;1:23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shrestha N, Adhikari M, Pant V, Baral S, Shrestha A, Basnyat B, et al. Melioidosis: misdiagnosed in Nepal. BMC Infect Dis. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12879-019-3793-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Karunarathna AKTM, Mendis SA, Perera WPDP, Patabendige G, Pallewatte AS, Kulatunga A. A case report of melioidosis complicated by infective sacroiliitis in Sri Lanka. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccin. 2018;4(1):12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin PFMS, Teh CSC, Casupang MAJ. Melioidosis: a rare cause of liver abscess. Case Rep Hepatol. 2016;2016:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Phillips NM, Cervin A, Earnshaw J, Sidjabat HE. Melioidosis in a patient with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(S4):S60–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mabayoje DA, Kenna DTD, Dance DAB, NicFhogartaigh C. Melioidosis manifesting as chronic femoral osteomyelitis in patient from Ghana. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(1):201–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang L, Yang Z, Zhou X-P, Wu J-R. Burkholderia pseudomallei infection presenting with a lung abscess and osteomyelitis in an adult man. Medicine. 2018;97(35): e12145.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Jayawardena N, Ralapanawa U, Kumarihamy P, Jayalath T, Abeygunawardana SP, Dissanayake N, et al. Infective myositis, an uncommon presentation of melioidosis: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13256-019-2321-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rahim M, Khan M, Chowdhury T, Ananna M. Septicemic melioidosis complicating undiagnosed chronic kidney disease and beta-thalassemia minor in a Bangladeshi farmer. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2020;31(6):1411–4.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zaw KK, Wasgewatta SL, Kwong KK, Fielding D, Heraganahally SS, Currie BJ. Chronic pulmonary melioidosis masquerading as lung malignancy diagnosed by EBUS guided sheath technique. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.100894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Nair AV, Menon V, Kumaran CK, Khan PS, Kochukunju BV, Kurian N. Arthroscopic management of a rare case of melioidotic septic arthritis of the ankle in a new endemic area on the southwest coast of India: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2106/JBJS.CC.16.00183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Commons RJ, Grivas R, Currie BJ. Melioidosis in a patient on monoclonal antibody therapy for psoriatic arthritis. Intern Med J. 2014;44(12a):1245–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wijekoon PWMCSB, Bandara KAS, Kailainathan A, Chandrasiri NS, Hapuarachchi CT. Guillaine-barre syndrome; a rare complication of melioidosis a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12879-016-1719-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Antony T, Moorthy S, Narayanaswamy A, Arthur P. Melioidosis presenting as septicaemia and facial nerve palsy. BMJ Case Rep. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/bcr-2017-221268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuijpers SC, Klouwens M, de Jong KH, Langeslag JCP, Kuipers S, Reubsaet FAG, et al. Primary cutaneous melioidosis acquired in Nepal—case report and literature review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ding CH, Hussin S, Tzar MN, Rahman MM, Ramli SR. A case of mycotic aneurysm due to Burkholderia pseudomallei. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2013. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12669/pjms.292.2815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wijewickrama PSA, Weerakoon R. Acute disseminated melioidosis giving rise to pneumonia and renal abscesses complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a post partum woman: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-017-2997-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Redondo MC, Gómez M, Landaeta ME, Ríos H, Khalil R, Guevara RN, et al. Melioidosis presenting as sepsis syndrome: a case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2011. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijid.2010.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vaid T, Rao K, Hande HM. An intriguing case of locked jaw secondary to melioidosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/bcr-2015-213060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Saonanon P, Tirakunwichcha S, Chierakul W. Case report of orbital cellulitis and necrotizing fasciitis from melioidosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/IOP.0b013e318275b601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee Y-L, Lee SS-J, Tsai H-C, Chen Y-S, Wann S-R, Kao C-H, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess caused by Burkhoderia pseudomallei in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105(8):689–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Svensson E, Welinder-Olsson C, Claesson BA, Studahl M. Cutaneous melioidosis in a Swedish tourist after the tsunami in 2004. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(1):71–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shrestha NK, Sharma SK, Khanal B, Bhata N, Dhakal SS. Melioidosis imported into Nepal. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(1):64–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bodilsen J, Langgaard H, Nielsen HL. Cutaneous melioidosis in a healthy Danish man after travelling to South-East Asia. Case Rep. 2015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/bcr-2014-207340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Behera B, Prasad Babu TLVD, Kamalesh A, Reddy G. Ceftazidime resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei: first report from India. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2012;5(4):329–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Saravu K, Kadavigere R, Shastry BA, Pai R, Mukhopadhyay C. Neurologic melioidosis presented as encephalomyelitis and subdural collection in two male labourers in India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9(11):1289–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pitman MC, Luck T, Marshall CS, Anstey NM, Ward L, Currie BJ. Intravenous therapy duration and outcomes in melioidosis: a new treatment paradigm. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003586.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Sullivan Id RP, Marshall CS, Anstey NM, Ward L, Currie BJ. Review and revision of the 2015 Darwin melioidosis treatment guideline; paradigm drift not shift. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Limmathurotsakul D, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis: a clinical overview. Br Med Bull. 2011;99(1):125–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lipsitz R, Garges S, Aurigemma R, Baccam P, Blaney DD, Cheng AC, et al. Workshop on treatment of and postexposure prophylaxis for Burkholderia pseudomallei and B. mallei Infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;18:e2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Non funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, 5008, Sri Lanka

    Keragala Arachchige Reshani Kaumada Keragala, Maththe Gama Ralalage Shobha Sanjeewani Gunathilaka & Jayaweera Arachchige Asela Sampath Jayaweera

  2. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, 5008, Sri Lanka

    Rathnabahu Mudiyanselage Indika Sanjeewa Kumara Senevirathna

Authors
  1. Keragala Arachchige Reshani Kaumada Keragala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maththe Gama Ralalage Shobha Sanjeewani Gunathilaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rathnabahu Mudiyanselage Indika Sanjeewa Kumara Senevirathna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jayaweera Arachchige Asela Sampath Jayaweera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RK and SG conceived the idea. RK designed the review. Both were involved in data collection. SJ and IS guided the data collection. RK performed a comprehensive literature search. RK and SG independently screened the titles and abstracts of all the identified studies for selection, according to inclusion criteria. The selected studies were independently reviewed by SJ to confirm eligibility. RK drafted the manuscript and SG, SJ, and IS critically revised it. SJ provided the overall supervision. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayaweera Arachchige Asela Sampath Jayaweera.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Summary of case reports where co-trimoxazole is used as eradication therapy.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

NIH quality assessment tool for the case series studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keragala, K.A.R.K., Gunathilaka, M.G.R.S.S., Senevirathna, R.M.I.S.K. et al. Efficacy and safety of co-trimoxazole in eradication phase of melioidosis; systematic review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 22, 74 (2023). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12941-023-00620-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12941-023-00620-z

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us