Skip to main content
Download PDF

Tetracyclines resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 22, Article number: 83 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Urogenital Mycoplasma infections are considered an important public health problem, owing to the presence of antibiotic resistance or decreased susceptibility, the treatment options are limited.

Objective

Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate resistance rates of genital Mycoplasmas to tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline).

Methods

We searched the relevant published studies in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until 3, March 2022. All statistical analyses were carried out using the statistical package R.

Results

The 26 studies included in the analysis were performed in 15 countries. In the metadata, the proportions of tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates were reported 14.2% (95% CI 8.2–23.2%), 5% (95% CI 3–8.1%), and 11.9% (95% CI 6.3–21.5%), respectively. According to the meta-regression, the tetracycline and minocycline resistance rate decreased over time. Although, the doxycycline resistance rate increased over time. There was a statistically significant difference in the tetracyclines resistance rates between different continents/countries (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prevalence rate and antibiotic susceptibility profiles vary geographically. Therefore, rigorous or improved antimicrobial stewardship, contact tracing, and enhanced intensive surveillance systems are necessitated for preventing the emergence and further spreading of tetracyclines resistance in genital Mycoplasmas.

Introduction

Mollicutes class contains the Mycoplasma genus is the smallest free-living and self-replicating micro-organisms [1, 2]. The Mycoplasma genus is divided into respiratory and genital Mycoplasmas. The genital Mycoplasmas include Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum, which are frequently found in the lower urogenital tract of sexually active healthy adults [3]. The prevalence rate of Mycoplasmas in the genital tract of sexually active Men and women is approximately 5–20% and 40–80%, respectively [4]. These microorganisms identified as causative agents of several urogenital disorders in adults and children and have global distribution [3, 5]. These disorders include bacterial vaginosis, non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), cystitis, pyelonephritis, endometritis, and cervicitis [3, 6, 7]. Also, the caused infection by these organisms may be symptomatic or asymptomatic. It is proven, that asymptomatic infections are related to increased risks of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility adverse pregnancy outcomes [8]. In another hand, because of serious complications in newborns and immunocompromised patients, adequate treatment and bacterial eradication is crucial.

Owing to the absence of the cell wall in Mycoplasmas, these bacteria have a natural resistance to antibiotics affecting on the cell wall, like glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) and beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins) [9, 10]. However, these bacteria are susceptible to antibiotics that interfere with bacterial DNA replication (quinolones) and bacterial protein synthesis (tetracyclines and macrolides). Therefore, currently, the abovementioned antibiotics are known as the first-line treatment and primary choice in the empirical treatment caused by Mycoplasmas [5]. But M. hominis has developed resistance to quinolones globally [11]. Also, resistance owing to mutations in 23S rRNA caused resistance to erythromycin and azithromycin [12, 13]. Thus, in Mycoplasmas infections tetracyclines class (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) is recommended as a primary choice of chemical therapy, except for pregnant women and neonates [14].

The extensive overuse of tetracyclines has led to a gradual rise in resistance of Mycoplasmas and, tetracyclines resistance strain is a growing phenomenon worldwide [1, 7]. While, the rising rates of resistant isolates have been noted, a limited number of studies performed on the status of resistance to tetracyclines. Therefore, this systematic meta-analysis was conducted to survey the status of resistance to the tetracycline class, (tetracycline, doxycycline and minocycline) by analyzing the related published studies.

Methods

This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) [15].

Search strategy and study selection

We systematically searched for relevant articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (Until August 2021) by using the related keywords: ("Mycoplasma" OR "Mycoplasma hominis" OR "M. hominis" OR "Mycoplasma genitalium" OR "M. genitalium" OR "Ureaplasma" OR "Ureaplasma urealyticum" OR "U. urealyticum" OR "Ureaplasma parvum" OR "U. parvum" AND "antibiotic" OR "antimicrobial" OR "tetracycline" OR "doxycycline" OR "minocycline" AND "resistance" OR "resistant") in the Title/Abstract/Keywords fields. No limitation was used while searching databases. The search strategy was designed and conducted by study investigators. References lists of all related studies were also reviewed for any other related publication. The records found through database searching were merged, and the duplicates were removed using EndNote X9 (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA). One of the team researchers randomly evaluated the search results and confirmed that no relevant study had been ignored. The authors did all these steps, and any disagreements about article selection were resolved through discussion. References from reviewed articles were also searched for more information.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The included studies met the following criteria: (1) original study that investigated tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human; (2) peer-reviewed articles published in English between 1978 and 2021; (3) specified the total number of tested Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma isolates; (4) reported the tetracyclines resistance rate in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma isolates. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies that contained duplicate data or were overlapping articles; (2) no clinical Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates; (3) reported antibiotic resistance of mycoplasmas other than M. hominis, U. urealyticum/parvum; (4) studied resistance to antibiotics other than tetracyclines; (5) reviews, meta-analysis and/or systematic review, and conference abstracts; (5) resistance rates were not clearly presented or reported.

Data extraction

The following items were extracted from each included study: first author, publication year, continent, country, participants’ characteristics (gender (male/female), type of complication) number of clinical M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum isolates, number of tetracyclines resistance rate in M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum isolates, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST; MIC-Based methods and Mycoplasma kits). Data were collected by two independent examiners and verified by another researcher. The resistance rate was expressed as the number of resistant isolates divided by the total number of isolates tested.

Quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was assessed by two reviewers separately using an adapted version of the tool proposed by the Newcastle–Ottawa assessment scale adapted for cross-sectional studies [16]. A score ranging from 0 to 8 points was attributed to each study (≥ 6 points: high quality, ≤ 5 points: low quality). A higher score indicated a higher study quality. A third reviewer adjudicated in any cases where there was disagreement.

Statistical analysis

The studies presenting raw data on tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human were included in the meta-analysis that was carried out using the meta-prop [17] command in R statistical software on all prevalence statistics by antibiotic, region (continents/countries) and AST. The meta-analysis results consist of a prevalence statistic with 95% confidence intervals calculated from the weighted prevalence statistics for all the studies in the specified sub-group by antibiotic, region (continents/countries), and AST. Meta-regression models were used to check for changing antibiotic resistance over time and male/female ratio. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's and begg's test. All statistical interpretations were reported on a 95% confidence interval (CI) basis. All statistical analyses were carried out using the statistical package R 3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) [18].

Study outcomes

The main outcome of interest was the proportion of tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human. A subgroup analysis was performed; [1] subgroup analyses were then employed by areas (continents/countries), [3] and AST. Meta-regression models were used to check for changing antibiotic resistance over time and male/female ratio.

Results

Systematic literature search

A total of 2741 records were identified in the initial search. From these, 2646 articles were excluded after an initial screening of the title and abstract due to their irrelevance and duplication. The full texts of the remaining 95 articles were reviewed (Fig. 1). From the 95 articles, 57 were excluded for the following reasons: (1) studies that contained duplicate data or were overlapping articles; (2) animal research, reviews, meta-analysis and/or systematic review, and conference abstracts; (3) tetracyclines resistance rates were not presented or reported. Finally, the 26 studies included [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] were published between 1978 and 2021 (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study selection

Full size image

Characteristics of included studies

The 26 studies included in the analysis were performed in 15 countries. The majority of the studies included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to tetracycline (20 reports) followed by doxycycline (15 reports), and minocycline (10 reports). Figure 2 showing forest plot proportions of resistance isolates to selected included antibiotics. The proportion of each antibiotic and the subgroup analyses by continent/countries, genus, species, and AST, are shown in Table 1. The trends in resistance rates to tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline are summarised below.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot proportions of tetracycline (A), doxycycline (B) and minocycline (C) resistance isolates to selected included antibiotics

Full size image
Table 1 Prevalence of tetracyclines resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates
Full size table

Tetracycline resistance

The susceptibility to tetracycline was determined in 20 studies, including 19,424 Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma isolates [M. hominis (984 isolates), U. urealyticum (17,871 isolates), and U. parvum (434 isolates)]; the proportions were 20% (95% CI 9–38%), 14% (95% CI 6–29%), and 4% (95% CI 1–19%) in M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum, respectively, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 88%; P = 0.21) was observed between included studies (Table 1, Fig. 2). Also, significant publication bias was detected (Egger rank correlation test, P = 0.0310). To analyze the trends for changes in the rate of tetracycline resistance in recent years, we performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of tetracycline resistance to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates over time (Fig. 3). According to the meta-regression, the tetracycline resistance rate decreased over time (r = −0.080; 95% CI −0.153 to −0.007, P = 0.032). We performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of tetracycline resistance in male/female ratio to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates. According to the meta-regression, the tetracycline resistance rate increased in male/female ratio (r = 0.012; 95% CI −0.011 to 0.036, P = 0.312). Among 14 countries (from 5 continents) reporting resistance data for tetracycline, 5 (35.7%) countries (Cuba, Iraq, Italy, Senegal, and Tunisia) reported that > 15% of isolates had tetracycline resistance. There was a statistically significant difference in the tetracycline resistance rates between different countries (P < 0.01) (Table 1). There was a statistically significant difference in the tetracycline resistance rates between different continents (P < 0.01), and this rate was higher in South America than Africa (44% vs 28%), Asia (44% vs 16%), North America (44% vs 10%), and Europe (44% vs 6%). No significant difference was found in the AST method (P = 0.98) (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of tetracycline (A), doxycycline (B) and minocycline (C) resistance to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates over time

Full size image

Doxycycline resistance

The susceptibility to doxycycline was determined in 15 studies, including 19,203 Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma isolates [M. hominis (710 isolates), U. urealyticum (18,371 isolates), and U. parvum (122 isolates)]; the proportions were 5% (95% CI 1–13%), 6% (95% CI 3–11%), and 3% (95% CI 0–31%) in M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum, respectively, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 93%; P = 0.83) was observed between included studies (Table 1, Fig. 2). Also, significant publication bias was detected (Egger rank correlation test, P = 0.0070). To analyze the trends for changes in the rate of doxycycline resistance in recent years, we performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of tetracycline resistance to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates over time (Fig. 3). According to the meta-regression, the doxycycline resistance rate increased over time (r = 0.059; 95% CI −0.027 to 0.145, P = 0.180). We performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of doxycycline resistance in male/female ratio to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates. According to the meta-regression, the doxycycline resistance rate decreased in male/female ratio (r = −0.021; 95% CI −0.052 to 0.011, P = 0.205). Among 10 countries (from 4 continents) reporting resistance data for tetracycline, 4 (25%) countries (Cuba, Iraq, Cameroon, and Senegal) reported that > 6% of isolates had doxycycline resistance. There was a statistically significant difference in the doxycycline resistance rates between different countries (P < 0.01) (Table 1). There was a statistically significant difference in the doxycycline resistance rates between different continents (P < 0.01), and this rate was higher in South America than Africa (17% vs 14%), Asia (17% vs 4%), and Europe (17% vs 2%). No significant difference was found in the AST method (P = 0.07) (Table 1).

Minocycline resistance

The susceptibility to minocycline was determined in 10 studies, including 1256 Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma isolates [M. hominis (92 isolates) and U. urealyticum (988 isolates)]; the proportions were 18% (95% CI 3–66%) and 9% (95% CI 4–21%) in M. hominis and U. urealyticum, respectively, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 88%; P = 0.5) was observed between included studies (Table 1, Fig. 2). Also, significant publication bias was detected (Egger rank correlation test, P = 0.6886). To analyze the trends for changes in the rate of minocycline resistance in recent years, we performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of minocycline resistance to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates over time (Fig. 3). According to the meta-regression, the minocycline resistance rate decreased over time (r = −0.015; 95% CI −0.066 to 0.035, P = 0.550). We performed a meta-regression analysis for changes in the proportion of minocycline in male/female ratio to Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma urogenital isolates. According to the meta-regression, the minocycline resistance rate increased in male/female ratio (r = −0.009; 95% CI −0.030 to 0.012, P = 0.396). Among 7 countries reporting resistance data for tetracycline, 5 (55.5%) countries (Cuba, Iraq, UK, and USA) reported that ≥ 10% of isolates had minocycline resistance. There was a statistically significant difference in the minocycline resistance rates between different countries (P < 0.01) (Table 1). There was a statistically significant difference in the minocycline resistance rates between different continents (P < 0.02), and this rate was higher in North America than South America (33% vs 15%), Europe (33% vs 12%), and Asia (33% vs 10%). No significant difference was found in the AST method (P = 0.63) (Table 1).

Discussion

Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma have been identified as important human pathogens of considerable urogenital problems such as non-gonococcal urethritis (NUG), cervicitis, and PID [45]. This family of bacteria (Mycoplasmataceae) remains understudied compared with other etiological agents of urinary tract infection (UTI), with less global financial support. In another hand, the innate absence of cell wall in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma have led to intrinsic resistance to beta-lactams (one of the most routinely used antibiotics which act on cell wall) and limits the options for chemical therapy [46]. Also, innate resistance to lincosamides has been seen in Ureaplasma spp. Furthermore, Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma have resistance to sulphonamides, trimethoprim, and rifampicin [46].

Alternatively, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides are widely used as effective anti-Mycoplasma agents [47]. Tetracyclines are ‘broad-spectrum’ antibiotics and have potent bacteriostatic activity against different pathogens, even Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma [48, 49]. While tetracyclines are divided into three generations, they have similar action mechanisms: first-generation, such as conventional tetracycline, which gets from biosynthesis. Second-generation like doxycycline and minocycline are semi-synthetic with improved properties and a wider spectrum of activity [50]. Finally, tigecycline is synthetic and located in third-generation with the highest and widest activity against gram-positive and negative bacteria (mini). Regarding action mechanisms, they can be passing through the bacterial membrane for reaching to target. This category of antibiotics is one of the most commonest used drugs against different forms of mycoplasmosis including urogenital or respiratory infections in adults, or animal infections on the farm as well [51]. The tetracycline antibiotics are capable of reversible binding to the 30S subunit of the bacterial ribosome, this interaction leads to the prevention of the association of aminoacyl-tRNA with the acceptor site in the bacterial ribosome and thus inhibition of the protein synthesis [51].

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we calculated the resistance rate of tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma spp, recovered from human urogenital. The tetracyclines resistance was greatly variable in different literatures performed in various locations. Probably, the various consumption rates of these antibiotics in different parts of the world are the major reason for zonal differences in resistance rates of urogenital Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species to the tetracyclines category [46]. Thus, reliable antibiotic susceptibility testing to obtain successful therapy is required. In another hand, Mycoplasmas and Ureaplasma like any other Mollicutes, are fastidious, thus their culture and routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing depend on specialized growth medium requirements. Therefore, commercial kits have been applied for detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing [52, 53]. Undoubtedly, each commercial kit has special efficiency in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. On the other hand, a large number of available kits have not confirmed breakpoints by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-recommended standard criteria for genital mycoplasmosis, and require confirming by other methods [54]. As a result, almost all urogenital mycoplasmosis infections are treated empirically [55]. Maybe, resistance heterogeneity and empirical therapy are two reasons for resistance development.

Our results demonstrated relatively high tetracyclines (including tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) resistance rates in M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum. It was also, the lowest resistance rate in M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum had been seen to minocycline. Moreover, the highest rate of resistance among these three antibiotics is associated with tetracycline, most likely due to massive and frequent misuse of this antibiotic [56]. These results are in concordance with the previous meta-analysis [5]. While chemical therapy is capable to abolish urogenital mycoplasmosis, failed treatment makes persistent infections and resistant-strains expansion. Other studies showed that the tetracyclines-resistant rate is increasing and changing over time [46, 57]. Therefore, successful treatment with these antibiotics will be limited, more challenging, and costlier in further infections [45, 57].

Tetracyclines resistant bacteria applied genes encoding resistance which were placed on plasmids and transposons elements. These elements are mobile and make bacteria competent to horizontal gene transfer and resistance expansion among pathogens including M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum [58, 59]. The development of tetracycline resistance in Mycoplasmas is associated with two major mechanisms including an active drug efflux pump and the production of ribosome-protecting proteins by the tet (M) gene [60]. This gene is located on transposon and encodes tetM protein (homolog of bacterial elongation factors) which causes conformational changes in the 30S ribosomal subunit and inhibition of tetracycline binding [47]. Moreover, several other mechanisms contribute to tetracyclines resistance including a decreased influx of antibiotics into the cell, antibiotic modification by enzymes, and target site modification by a mutation in the tetracycline-binding unit of 16S rRNA [5, 51, 56].

Recently, tetracyclines resistance Mycoplasmas have increased greatly; this phenomenon is a growing problem worldwide. Undoubtedly, an uninterrupted effort is required to urgently discover new therapeutic options, which lead to improved treatment. Raising knowledge in resistance mechanisms to tetracyclines and the development of chemical substances provided a potent capacity to introduce new effective generations of tetracyclines. However, not only the new generation of tetracyclines but also the international monitoring system exposing reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial.

Interpretation of the present study results is constrained by several limitations. Firstly, variety in sample size can affect the analysis. But, the problem was solved by calculating and reporting of relative weight for each study. Another limitation is excluding the published articles other than the English language, therefore some articles would have been missed.

Conclusions

In summary, regarding the present meta-analysis, the overall resistance rate to tetracyclines (tetracyclines, doxycycline, and minocycline) is relatively high in urogenital Mycoplasmas including M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum. Also, the geographical variations in the prevalence of resistance showed that resistance in America continent is higher in comparison to other continents. These geographical variations demonstrate the importance of regional antibiotic susceptibility testing to control and eliminate infections caused by resistant strains.

Availability of data and materials

All the data in this review are included in the manuscript. The data of the study is with the corresponding author of the article and can be made available on request.

Abbreviations

PID:

Pelvic inflammatory disease

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses

AST:

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

CI:

Confidence interval

NUG:

Non-gonococcal urethritis

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

References

  1. Kong Y, Qiao Y, Song J, Ruan Z, Fei C, Huang J, et al. Comparative analysis of male and female populations on prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Mycoplasma hominis in China, 2005–2014. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;6:69–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang W, Li L, Zhang X, Fang H, Chen H, Rong C. Infection prevalence and antibiotic resistance levels in Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in gynecological outpatients of a tertiary hospital in China from 2015 to 2018. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2021/8842267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vargović M, Pasini M, Papić N, Andrašević S, Markotić A, Butić I, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(1):69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riedel S, Morse SA, Mietzner TA, Miller S. Jawetz Melnick & Adelbergs medical microbiology 28 E. New York: McGraw Hill Professional; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmadi MH. Resistance to tetracyclines among clinical isolates of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(4):865–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skiljevic D, Mirkov D, Vukicevic J. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in genital samples collected over 6 years at a Serbian university hospital. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tadongfack TD, Nitcheu ILS, Keubo FRN, Mutarambirwa HD, Tedjieu RH, Tatang CT, et al. Epidemiology, prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of sexually transmitted Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in Dschang, West Cameroon. Microbiol Res J Int. 2020;30(11):19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waites KB, Schelonka RL, Xiao L, Grigsby PL, Novy MJ, editors. Congenital and opportunistic infections: Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis. Seminars in fetal and neonatal medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Francesco MA, Caracciolo S, Bonfanti C, Manca N. Incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum isolated in Brescia, Italy, over 7 years. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19(4):621–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Yang JS. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species in nonpregnant female patients in South Korea indicate an increasing trend of pristinamycin-resistant isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(10):e01065-e1120.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xie X, Zhang J. Trends in the rates of resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum to antibiotics and identification of the mutation site in the quinolone resistance-determining region in Chinese patients. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;259(2):181–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furneri PM, Rappazzo G, Musumarra MP, Tempera G, Roccasalva LS. Genetic basis of natural resistance to erythromycin in Mycoplasma hominis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45(4):547–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kechagia N, Bersimis S, Chatzipanagiotou S. Incidence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of genital mycoplasmas in outpatient women with clinical vaginitis in Athens, Greece. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62(1):122–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Waites KB, Crabb DM, Bing X, Duffy LB. In vitro susceptibilities to and bactericidal activities of garenoxacin (BMS-284756) and other antimicrobial agents against human mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(1):161–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, med PGJP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Modesti PA, Reboldi G, Cappuccio FP, Agyemang C, Remuzzi G, Rapi S, et al. Panethnic differences in blood pressure in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0147601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzer GJRn. meta: an R package for meta-analysis. 2007; 7(3): 40–5.

  18. Team RCJhwR-po. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013.

  19. Evans RT, Taylor-Robinson D. The incidence of tetracycline-resistant strains of Ureaplasma urealyticum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978;4(1):57–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Magalhaes M, Veras A. Minocycline resistance among clinical isolates of Ureaplasma urealyticum. J Infect Dis. 1984. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/infdis/149.1.117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts MC, Kenny GE. TetM tetracycline-resistant determinants in Ureaplasma urealyticum. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986;5(6 Suppl):S338–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Busolo F, Conventi L. In vitro activity of antibiotics against Ureaplasma urealyticum and Chlamydia trachomatis strains from patients with nongonococcal urethritis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7(3):407–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cakan H, Polat E, Kocazeybek B, Ocal P, Cepni I, Aslan M, et al. Assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum from prostitutes and outpatient clinic patients using the E-test and agar dilution method. Chemotherapy. 2003;49(1–2):39–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang C, Liu Z, Lin N, Tu Y, Li J, Zhang D. Susceptibility of mixed infection of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis to seven antimicrobial agents and comparison with that of Ureaplasma urealyticum infection. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2003;23(2):203–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie X, Zhang J. Trends in the rates of resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum to antibiotics and identification of the mutation site in the quinolone resistance-determining region in Chinese patients. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;259(2):181–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang-tai Z, Zhong-yi H, Chun-lei D, Chang-song Z, Mei-zhen W, Yang L. Investigation of Ureaplasma urealyticum biovars and their relationship with antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29(3):288–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Govender S, Gqunta K, le Roux M, de Villiers B, Chalkley LJ. Antibiotic susceptibilities and resistance genes of Ureaplasma parvum isolated in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(12):2821–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Díaz L, Cabrera LE, Fernández T, Ibáñez I, Torres Y, Obregón Y, et al. Frequency and antimicrobial sensitivity of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in patients with vaginal discharge. MEDICC Rev. 2013;15(4):45–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pignanelli S, Pulcrano G, Iula VD, Zaccherini P, Testa A, Catania MR. In vitro antimicrobial profile of Ureaplasma urealyticum from genital tract of childbearing-aged women in Northern and Southern Italy. APMIS. 2014;122(6):552–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye G, Jiang Z, Wang M, Huang J, Jin G, Lu S. The resistance analysis of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in female reproductive tract specimens. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;68(1):207–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tzimoula K, Maria E, Eudoxia D, Georgia G, Angeliki M, Nikolaos M. Detection of the tetM resistance determinant among phenotypically sensitive Ureaplasma species by a novel real-time PCR method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernández J, Karau MJ, Cunningham SA, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Patel R. Antimicrobial susceptibility and clonality of clinical ureaplasma isolates in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(8):4793–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. He M, Xie Y, Zhang R, Gao S, Xu G, Zhang L, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Mycoplasmas and Chlamydiae in patients with genital tract infections in Shanghai, China. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(8):548–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Dahmoshi HOM, Al-Sharef HK, Kadhum SA, Al-Asskar JA, Al-Khafaji NS, Karkosh AS. Rapid detection and antibiotic susceptibility of genital mycoplasma isolated from male with urethritis and prostatitis, Iraq. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22207/JPAM.11.4.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-khafaji GK. Susceptibility and antimicrobial resistance of genital Ureaplasma Parvum. Nano Biomed Eng. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5101/nbe.v9i3.p236-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Valentine-King MA, Brown MB. Antibacterial resistance in ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis isolates from urine cultures in college-aged females. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/AAC.01104-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Meygret A, Le Roy C, Renaudin H, Bébéar C, Pereyre S. Tetracycline and fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis isolates in France between 2010 and 2015. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(10):2696–703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Dahmoshi HO, Alwash MS, Chabuck SI, Al-Khafaji NS, Jabuk SI. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of genital mycoplasma infections in pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.01076.X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Song T, Huang J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Kong Y, Ruan Z. Antibiotic susceptibilities and genetic variations in macrolide resistance genes of Ureaplasma spp. isolated in China. New Microbiol. 2019;42(4):225–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahouga Voufo R, Maïdadi MF, Mbah EC, Esemu LF, Fouodji HP, Molu JP, et al. STUDY on the gender prevalence and sensitivity of urogenital mycoplasmas to antibiotics in Yaounde, Cameroon. Sci Afr. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baraïka MA, Onanga R, Bivigou-Mboumba B, Mabika-Mabika A, Bisvigou UJ, Touré Ndouo FS, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in female population, Gabon. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2020;8:28.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Boujemaa S, Mlik B, Mardassi H, Mardassi BBA. Clonal spread of tetracycline resistance among Mycoplasma hominis clinical strains, Tunisia. Infect Drug Resist. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2147/IDR.S249630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Doroftei B, Ilie OD, Armeanu T, Anton E, Scripcariu I, Maftei R. The prevalence of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis infections in infertile patients in the Northeast Region of Romania. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2021;57(3):211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rehman SU, Day J, Afshar B, Rowlands RS, Billam H, Joseph A, et al. Molecular exploration for Mycoplasma amphoriforme, Mycoplasma fermentans and Ureaplasma spp. in patient samples previously investigated for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Access Microbiol. 2021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/acmi.ac2020.po0444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Daubenspeck JM, Totten AH, Needham J, Feng M, Balish MF, Atkinson TP, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium biofilms contain poly-GlcNAc and contribute to antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:585524.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kokkayil P, Dhawan B. Ureaplasma: current perspectives. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(2):205–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Waites KB, Lysnyansky I, Bébéar CM. Emerging antimicrobial resistance in mycoplasmas of humans and animals. Mollicutes: molecular biology and pathogenesis. 2014:289–322.

  48. Boujemaa S, Mlik B, Ben Allaya A, Mardassi H, Mardassi BB. Spread of multidrug resistance among Ureaplasma serovars, Tunisia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cazanave C, Manhart L, Bébéar C. Mycoplasma genitalium, an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen. Med Mal Infect. 2012;42(9):381–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Markley JL, Fang L, Gasparrini AJ, Symister CT, Kumar H, Tolia NH, et al. Semisynthetic analogues of anhydrotetracycline as inhibitors of tetracycline destructase enzymes. ACS Infect Dis. 2019;5(4):618–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chernova O, Medvedeva E, Mouzykantov A, Baranova N, Chernov V. Mycoplasmas and their antibiotic resistance: the problems and prospects in controlling infections. Acta Naturae. 2016;8(2):24–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Morris DJ, Jones LC, Davies RL, Sands K, Portal E, Spiller OB. MYCO WELL D-ONE detection of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis in sexual health patients in Wales. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39:2427–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mao X-R, Wang R-C, Li R-J, Zhou C-R, Chen X-K, Cheng C-C, et al. An observational study: is N-acetylcysteine helpful in performance improvement of Mycoplasma IST2 testing through sample homogenization? Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2020/1391698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Noh J-W, Kim K-B, Lee JH, Lee Y, Lee B-H, Kwon YD, et al. Breakpoints of the Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(6):1252.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Beeton ML, Spiller OB. Antibiotic resistance among Ureaplasma spp. isolates: cause for concern? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;2016:dkw425.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Berçot B, Charreau I, Rousseau C, Delaugerre C, Chidiac C, Pialoux G, et al. High prevalence and high rate of antibiotic resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium infections in men who have sex with men: a substudy of the ANRS IPERGAY pre-exposure prophylaxis trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(7):e2127–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dumke R, Spornraft-Ragaller P. Antibiotic resistance and genotypes of Mycoplasma genitalium during a resistance-guided treatment regime in a German university hospital. Antibiotics. 2021;10(8):962.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dai M, Lu J, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yuan Z. In vitro development and transfer of resistance to chlortetracycline in Bacillus subtilis. J Microbiol. 2012;50:807–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jahan M, Zhanel GG, Sparling R, Holley RA. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance from Enterococcus faecium of fermented meat origin to clinical isolates of E. faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;199:78–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mardassi BBA, Aissani N, Moalla I, Dhahri D, Dridi A, Mlik B. Evidence for the predominance of a single tet (M) gene sequence type in tetracycline-resistant Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma hominis isolates from Tunisian patients. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(9):1254–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Analysis and clinical application of urolithiasis in Tibetan and Qiang people in Jiuzhaigou (Y2021013).

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urology Department of Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China

    Xiaoyan Wen & Yue Yang

  2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan Branch, Sirjan, Iran

    Mojgan Sarabi Nobakht

  3. Laboratory Sciences Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

    Ebrahim Kouhsari, Sara Hajilari & Matin Zafar Shakourzadeh

  4. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

    Khalil Azizian

Authors
  1. Xiaoyan Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojgan Sarabi Nobakht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yue Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ebrahim Kouhsari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sara Hajilari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matin Zafar Shakourzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Khalil Azizian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YY, SH, and MZS substantially contributed to the data extraction of the review article of the work. EK substantially contributed to the conception, design, drafting, and interpretation of the relevant literature of the review article of the work. MSN substantially contributed to the analysis of the work. KHA and XW have been involved in writing and acquisition of data or revising the review article for intellectual content. All authors agreed and confirmed the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Wen or Khalil Azizian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Basic information of the included studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, X., Nobakht, M.S., Yang, Y. et al. Tetracyclines resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 22, 83 (2023). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12941-023-00628-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12941-023-00628-5

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us