Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparative analysis of phenotypic vs. genotypic methods in carbapenemase gene identification - overall performance Metrics

From: Exploring New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: genotypic vs. phenotypic insights

Carbapenem-resistant bacterial strains

PCR and Lateral flow categories

Subcategories

NGS

PPV %

NPV%

Kappa

(CI 95%)

Detection

Variants

E. coli

Positive

blaNDM (n = 5)

5 (100%)

blaNDM−5

100

100

0.91[0.66 − 1]

co-producers of blaNDM and blaOXA (n = 5)

5 (100%)

blaOXA−1, blaOXA−181

100

100

0.91[0.66 − 1]

Negative

blaNDM and blaOXA (n = 2)

Not detected

blaOXA without blaNDM (n = 2)

2 (100%)

blaOXA−181

100

100

0.34[0.15 − 0.55]

K. pneumoniae

Positive

blaNDM (n = 5)

2 (40%)

blaNDM−5

40

40

0.20[0.10 − 0.2]*

co-producers of blaNDM and blaOXA (n = 5)

5 (100%)

blaOXA−232

100

100

0.91[0.66 − 1]

Negative

blaNDM and blaOXA (n = 2)

Not detected

blaOXA without blaNDM (n = 2)

2 (100%)

blaOXA−232

100

100

0.34[0.15 − 0.55]

  1. The comparative effectiveness of phenotypic (lateral flow) and genotypic (PCR) methods was assessed through whole genome sequencing to detect the presence of the New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamases (blaNDM) gene in carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (CREK). Numbers expressed in percentage (%). PPV: Positive Predictive Value; NPV: Negative Predictive Value